Skip to content
Orange Pi 6 PlusRadxa Dragon Q8B

Orange Pi 6 Plus vs Radxa Dragon Q8B

Tested by Bret Weber Last updated

Orange Pi 6 PlusvsRadxa Dragon Q8B

Fastest

Orange Pi 6 Plus

7,130 GB6 multi-core

Best value

Orange Pi 6 Plus

10.7 GB6 pts/$ at $669

Most efficient

Radxa Dragon Q8B

25.1W under load

Comparison Summary

This comparison puts the Orange Pi 6 Plus and the Radxa Dragon Q8B side by side using benchmark results from our own testing of each board. CPU performance is close: the Orange Pi 6 Plus scores 7,130 in Geekbench 6 multi-core against 7,058 for the Radxa Dragon Q8B, a gap of just 1%. For budget-focused builds, the Orange Pi 6 Plus wins the value contest at 10.7 multi-core points per dollar at $669.00. The Radxa Dragon Q8B is the most frugal under load, drawing 25.1W (5.9W at idle).

Read our individual reviews:

Specification
Basic Specifications
Tested SetupStandard
Price$676.99
RAM32GB32GB
SoC
Immortalis-G720 MC10
Arm China Zhouyi (30 TOPS)
Qualcomm® Adreno 690
Qualcomm Hexagon (15 TOPS)
ArchitectureARMARM
CPU Cores
12 cores
4× Cortex-A720 @ 2.6GHz
4× Cortex-A720 @ 2.4GHz
4× Cortex-A520 @ 1.8GHz
8 cores
4× Cortex-X1 @ 3.0GHz
4× Cortex-A78 @ 2.4GHz
Best in category* Affiliate link; qualifying purchases may earn us a commission

Every figure above comes from hardware run in-house by Bret Weber, on the exact OS build, kernel, firmware and boot device listed here. Boards are tested to a fixed procedure so results stay comparable between them: see our testing methodology for how each benchmark is run.

📖

Detailed Reviews

Full write-ups on bret.dk, using the same benchmark data:

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)

CPU Performance

Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads

Geekbench 6

Higher Scores are Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)1,328 21% slower #3 of 72
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)1,683 #1 of 72
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)7,130 #1 of 72
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)7,058 1% slower #2 of 72

Geekbench 7

Higher Scores are Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)1,179 21% slower #3 of 11
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)1,492 #1 of 11
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)7,038 5% slower #2 of 7
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)7,407 #1 of 7

7-Zip Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)3,804 MIPS 15% slower #6 of 118
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)4,467 MIPS #1 of 118
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)34,167 MIPS 6% slower #2 of 113
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)36,243 MIPS #1 of 113

High Performance Linpack

Higher Scores are Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)136.76 GFLOPS 13% slower #3 of 80
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)156.38 GFLOPS #1 of 80
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)3.12 GFLOPS/W #10 of 74
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)3.1 GFLOPS/W 1% slower #11 of 74

UnixBench

Higher Scores are Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)1,390 18% slower #15 of 118
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)1,703 #1 of 118
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)10,152 #1 of 109
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)9,965 2% slower #2 of 109

CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)

Higher Hashrates are Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)4.83 kH/s 24% slower #8 of 108
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)6.33 kH/s #3 of 108
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)42.85 kH/s 4% slower #4 of 104
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)44.68 kH/s #1 of 104

PassMark CPU

Higher Scores are Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)CPU Score: 7,259#2 of 96

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

Memory Performance

Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks

TinyMemBench

Higher Bandwidth is Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)16,196.5 MB/s 11% slower #3 of 65
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)18,181 MB/s #1 of 65
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)35,067.7 MB/s 17% slower #5 of 65
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)42,178.9 MB/s #1 of 65

PassMark RAM

Higher Scores are Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)RAM Score: 1,987#4 of 87

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

GPU Performance

Graphics rendering with OpenGL and Vulkan, plus raw Vulkan compute throughput

glmark2 (OpenGL)

Higher Scores are Better

Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)1080p: 1,457#2 of 274K: 480#3 of 20

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

vkmark (Vulkan)

Higher Scores are Better

Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)1080p: 900#4 of 64K: 996#1 of 6

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

SuperTuxKart (Gaming)

Higher FPS is Better

Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)1080p Typical: 153 FPS#1 of 111080p Steady: 100 FPS#1 of 114K Typical: 45 FPS#1 of 94K Steady: 34 FPS#1 of 8

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

AI & LLM Performance

Large Language Model inference performance

Ollama LLM Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)16.95 tok/s 22% slower #4 of 66
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)21.85 tok/s #2 of 66
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)0.56 tok/W 38% slower #46 of 64
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)0.91 tok/W #17 of 64
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)0.07 tok/$ #12 of 59
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)0.03 tok/$ 2.3× slower #41 of 59

Storage Performance

Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO

fio Storage Performance - microSD

Higher Speeds are Better • Raspberry Pi 64GB (64GB microSD)

4K Random Read
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)8.2 MB/s 2.5× slower
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)20.3 MB/s
4K Random Write
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)6.6 MB/s 2.2× slower
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)14.3 MB/s

fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe

Higher Speeds are Better • Crucial P5 Plus (1024GB M.2 NVMe)

4K Random Read
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)885.2 MB/s 21% slower
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)1,120.4 MB/s
4K Random Write
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)627 MB/s 42% slower
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)1,086.5 MB/s

fio Storage Performance - UFS

Higher Speeds are Better • Radxa UFS (128GB UFS)

Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)4K Random Read: 501.1 MB/s4K Random Write: 255.1 MB/s

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

Network Performance

Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3

iPerf3 Network Performance

Higher Speeds are Better

Ethernet Up
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)4,682 Mbps
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)2,342 Mbps 50% slower
Ethernet Down
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)4,675 Mbps
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)2,339 Mbps 50% slower

Power & Thermal

Power consumption at idle and under various workloads

Power Consumption

Lower is "Better"

Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)13.3W 2.3× more #73 of 74
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)5.9W #71 of 74
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)26.6W 6% more #104 of 105
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)25.1W #103 of 105
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)35.7W 28% more #64 of 64
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)27.9W #62 of 64
Orange Pi 6 Plus (32GB)43.8W #74 of 75
Radxa Dragon Q8B (32GB)50.3W 15% more #75 of 75

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the Orange Pi 6 Plus or the Radxa Dragon Q8B?

The Orange Pi 6 Plus is faster in our testing, scoring 7,130 in Geekbench 6 multi-core versus 7,058 for the Radxa Dragon Q8B, a 1% advantage.

Which board is the best value?

Of the boards in this comparison, the Orange Pi 6 Plus offers the best performance per dollar: 10.7 Geekbench 6 multi-core points per dollar at $669.00.

Add One More Board

You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.