Skip to content
ArmSoM Sige5ArmSoM Sige7

ArmSoM Sige5 vs ArmSoM Sige7

Tested by Bret Weber Last updated

ArmSoM Sige5vsArmSoM Sige7

Fastest

ArmSoM Sige7

3,139 GB6 multi-core

Best value

ArmSoM Sige7

10.1 GB6 pts/$ at $312

Most efficient

ArmSoM Sige5

6.1W under load

Comparison Summary

Here we line up the ArmSoM Sige5 and the ArmSoM Sige7, comparing specifications against benchmark numbers we measured ourselves on every board. Processor-wise, there is a clear winner. The ArmSoM Sige7 scores 3,139 in Geekbench 6 multi-core, 118% more than the ArmSoM Sige5 manages at 1,440. On performance per dollar the ArmSoM Sige7 comes out ahead, delivering 10.1 multi-core points per dollar at $312.00. If power budget matters, the ArmSoM Sige5 draws the least at 6.1W under load (3.0W at idle).

Specification
Basic Specifications
Price
RAM8GB8GB
SoC
Mali-G52 MC3
NPU (6 TOPS)
Mali-G610 MP4
Rockchip NPU 3.0 (6 TOPS)
ArchitectureARMARM
CPU Cores
8 cores
4× Cortex-A72 @ 2.2GHz
4× Cortex-A53 @ 2.0GHz
8 cores
4× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz
4× Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
Best in category* Affiliate link; qualifying purchases may earn us a commission

Every figure above comes from hardware run in-house by Bret Weber, on the exact OS build, kernel, firmware and boot device listed here. Boards are tested to a fixed procedure so results stay comparable between them: see our testing methodology for how each benchmark is run.

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)

CPU Performance

Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads

Geekbench 6

Higher Scores are Better

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)332 2.6× slower #41 of 72
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)865 #21 of 72
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)1,440 2.2× slower #37 of 72
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)3,139 #12 of 72

7-Zip Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)1,796 MIPS 43% slower #45 of 118
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)3,159 MIPS #19 of 118
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)11,391 MIPS 30% slower #33 of 113
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)16,212 MIPS #14 of 113

High Performance Linpack

Higher Scores are Better

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)22.61 GFLOPS 44% slower #37 of 80
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)40.22 GFLOPS #18 of 80
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)2.61 GFLOPS/W #22 of 74
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)1.99 GFLOPS/W 24% slower #52 of 74

UnixBench

Higher Scores are Better

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)492 2.8× slower #53 of 118
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)1,384 #17 of 118
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)3,252 50% slower #44 of 109
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)6,443 #6 of 109

PassMark CPU

Higher Scores are Better

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)2,189 29% slower #34 of 95
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)3,082 #19 of 95

CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)

Higher Hashrates are Better

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)2.7 kH/s 28% slower #41 of 108
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)3.74 kH/s #23 of 108
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)17.73 kH/s 20% slower #31 of 104
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)22.06 kH/s #14 of 104

Memory Performance

Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks

PassMark RAM

Higher Scores are Better

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)1,004 30% slower #33 of 87
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)1,429 #10 of 87

TinyMemBench

Higher Bandwidth is Better

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)memcpy: 5,661.6 MB/s#20 of 65memset: 16,885.8 MB/s#13 of 65

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

AI & LLM Performance

Large Language Model inference performance

Ollama LLM Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)8.22 tok/s #26 of 66
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)0.2 tok/s 41.1× slower #64 of 66
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)1.01 tok/W #14 of 64
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)0.02 tok/W 50.5× slower #61 of 64
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)0.03 tok/$ #41 of 59
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)No Data

Storage Performance

Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO

fio Storage Performance - eMMC

Higher Speeds are Better • ArmSoM Sige5 (64GB eMMC), ArmSoM Sige7 (64GB eMMC)

4K Random Read
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)50.5 MB/s
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)35.7 MB/s 29% slower
4K Random Write
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)76.8 MB/s
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)53 MB/s 31% slower

fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe

Higher Speeds are Better • Crucial P5 Plus (1024GB M.2 NVMe)

4K Random Read
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)375.5 MB/s 2.2× slower
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)842.2 MB/s
4K Random Write
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)307.6 MB/s 48% slower
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)588.2 MB/s

Network Performance

Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3

iPerf3 Network Performance

Higher Speeds are Better

Ethernet Up
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)938 Mbps 2.5× slower
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)2,355 Mbps
Ethernet Down
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)939 Mbps 2.5× slower
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)2,359 Mbps

Power & Thermal

Power consumption at idle and under various workloads

Power Consumption

Lower is "Better"

ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)3W #49 of 74
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)5.4W 80% more #70 of 74
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)6.1W #60 of 105
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)10.1W 66% more #94 of 105
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)8.6W #30 of 64
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)12.1W 41% more #49 of 64
ArmSoM Sige5 (8GB)8.7W #29 of 75
ArmSoM Sige7 (8GB)20.2W 2.3× more #66 of 75

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the ArmSoM Sige7 or the ArmSoM Sige5?

The ArmSoM Sige7 is faster in our testing, scoring 3,139 in Geekbench 6 multi-core versus 1,440 for the ArmSoM Sige5, a 118% advantage.

Which board is the best value?

Of the boards in this comparison, the ArmSoM Sige7 offers the best performance per dollar: 10.1 Geekbench 6 multi-core points per dollar at $312.00.

Add One More Board

You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.