Skip to content
Raspberry Pi 5Radxa ROCK 5C

Raspberry Pi 5 vs Radxa ROCK 5C

Tested by Bret Weber Last updated

Raspberry Pi 5vsRadxa ROCK 5C

Fastest

Radxa ROCK 5C

2,962 GB6 multi-core

Best value

Radxa ROCK 5C

17.8 GB6 pts/$ at $166

Most efficient

Raspberry Pi 5

6.5W under load

Comparison Summary

Here we line up the Raspberry Pi 5 and the Radxa ROCK 5C, comparing specifications against benchmark numbers we measured ourselves on every board. Processor-wise, there is a clear winner. The Radxa ROCK 5C scores 2,962 in Geekbench 6 multi-core, 35% more than the Raspberry Pi 5 manages at 2,188. On performance per dollar the Radxa ROCK 5C comes out ahead, delivering 17.8 multi-core points per dollar at $165.99. The Raspberry Pi 5 is the most frugal under load, drawing 6.5W.

Read our individual reviews:

Specification
Basic Specifications
RAM Size
Standard
Price
$188.92
$165.99
RAM8GB4GB
SoC
VideoCore VII
Mali-G610 MP4
NPU (6 TOPS)
ArchitectureARMARM
CPU Cores
4 cores
4× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz
8 cores
4× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz
4× Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
Best in category* Affiliate link; qualifying purchases may earn us a commission

Every figure above comes from hardware run in-house by Bret Weber, on the exact OS build, kernel, firmware and boot device listed here. Boards are tested to a fixed procedure so results stay comparable between them: see our testing methodology for how each benchmark is run.

📖

Detailed Reviews

Full write-ups on bret.dk, using the same benchmark data:

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)

CPU Performance

Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads

Geekbench 6

Higher Scores are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)902 #13 of 72
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)834 8% slower #25 of 72
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)2,188 26% slower #26 of 72
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)2,962 #22 of 72

7-Zip Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)3,334 MIPS #14 of 118
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)3,026 MIPS 9% slower #26 of 118
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)12,000 MIPS 23% slower #27 of 113
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)15,681 MIPS #18 of 113

High Performance Linpack

Higher Scores are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)36.6 GFLOPS #23 of 80
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)34.42 GFLOPS 6% slower #26 of 80
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)3.16 GFLOPS/W #9 of 74
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)2.1 GFLOPS/W 33% slower #42 of 74

UnixBench

Higher Scores are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)1,654 #2 of 118
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)1,351 18% slower #19 of 118
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)4,920 22% slower #22 of 109
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)6,295 #8 of 109

PassMark CPU

Higher Scores are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)2,394 20% slower #24 of 95
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)2,989 #20 of 95

CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)

Higher Hashrates are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)3.86 kH/s #14 of 108
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)3.58 kH/s 7% slower #33 of 108
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)15.43 kH/s 27% slower #34 of 104
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)21.07 kH/s #23 of 104

Memory Performance

Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks

PassMark RAM

Higher Scores are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)1,374 #16 of 87
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)1,286 6% slower #20 of 87

GPU Performance

Graphics rendering with OpenGL and Vulkan, plus raw Vulkan compute throughput

glmark2 (OpenGL)

Higher Scores are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)1080p: 657#10 of 244K: 150#11 of 18

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

vkmark (Vulkan)

Higher Scores are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)1080p: 406#5 of 64K: 93#5 of 6

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

AI & LLM Performance

Large Language Model inference performance

Ollama LLM Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)12.02 tok/s #8 of 66
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)0.2 tok/s 60.1× slower #64 of 66
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)1.24 tok/W #5 of 64
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)0.02 tok/W 62.0× slower #61 of 64
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)0.06 tok/$ #24 of 59
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)No Data

Storage Performance

Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO

fio Storage Performance - microSD

Higher Speeds are Better • Raspberry Pi 64GB (64GB microSD)

4K Random Read
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)22 MB/s
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)14.3 MB/s 35% slower
4K Random Write
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)15.1 MB/s
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)10.7 MB/s 29% slower

fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe

Higher Speeds are Better • Crucial P5 Plus (1024GB M.2 NVMe)

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)4K Random Read: 866.5 MB/s4K Random Write: 590.6 MB/s

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

Network Performance

Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3

iPerf3 Network Performance

Higher Speeds are Better

Ethernet Up
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)937 Mbps 1% slower
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)942 Mbps
Ethernet Down
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)941 Mbps
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)941 Mbps

Power & Thermal

Power consumption at idle and under various workloads

Power Consumption

Lower is "Better"

Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)No Data
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)2.4W #40 of 74
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)6.5W #69 of 105
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)7.4W 14% more #78 of 105
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)10.8W 14% more #42 of 64
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)9.5W #37 of 64
Raspberry Pi 5 (8GB)11.6W #45 of 75
Radxa ROCK 5C (4GB)16.4W 41% more #57 of 75

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the Radxa ROCK 5C or the Raspberry Pi 5?

The Radxa ROCK 5C is faster in our testing, scoring 2,962 in Geekbench 6 multi-core versus 2,188 for the Raspberry Pi 5, a 35% advantage.

Which board is the best value?

Of the boards in this comparison, the Radxa ROCK 5C offers the best performance per dollar: 17.8 Geekbench 6 multi-core points per dollar at $165.99.

Add One More Board

You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.