ArmSoM logoNVIDIA logo

ArmSoM AIM7 vs NVIDIA Jetson Nano

Benchmarks, specifications, and real-world performance data

ArmSoM AIM7vsNVIDIA Jetson Nano

Fastest

ArmSoM AIM7

3,186 GB6 multi-core

Best value

NVIDIA Jetson Nano

16.2 GB6 pts/$ at $49

Most efficient

NVIDIA Jetson Nano

7.2W under load

Comparison Summary

This comparison puts the ArmSoM AIM7 and the NVIDIA Jetson Nano side by side using benchmark results from our own testing of each board. The ArmSoM AIM7 takes the CPU crown: 3,186 in Geekbench 6 multi-core against the NVIDIA Jetson Nano's 795, a 301% advantage. For budget-focused builds, the NVIDIA Jetson Nano wins the value contest at 16.2 multi-core points per dollar ($49.00 list). If power budget matters, the NVIDIA Jetson Nano draws the least at 7.2W under load.

Read our individual reviews:

Specification
Basic Specifications
Price
$297*
RAM8GB2GB
SoC
Mali-G610 MP4
Rockchip NPU 3.0 (6 TOPS)
ArchitectureARMARM
CPU Cores
8 cores
4× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz
4× Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
4 cores
4× Cortex-A57 @ 1.5GHz
Best in category* Manufacturer's RRP** Affiliate link; qualifying purchases may earn us a commission
📖

Detailed Reviews

Read our comprehensive reviews from bret.dk featuring data and benchmarks from sbc.compare:

bret.dk logo
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)

CPU Performance

Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads

Geekbench 6

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)828
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)2613.2× slower
Multi-Core
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)3,186
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)7954.0× slower

7-Zip Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core Combined
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)2,546 MIPS
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)1,225 MIPS2.1× slower
Multi-Core Combined
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)16,695 MIPS
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)4,080 MIPS4.1× slower

High Performance Linpack

Higher Scores are Better

Performance
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)48.61 GFLOPS
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)10.26 GFLOPS4.7× slower
Performance/Watt
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)2.49 GFLOPS/W
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)1.13 GFLOPS/W2.2× slower

UnixBench

Higher Scores are Better

Single Core
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)1,060
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)3033.5× slower
Multi Core
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)5,382
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)1,0325.2× slower

PassMark CPU

Higher Scores are Better

CPU Score
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)3,199
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)1,0243.1× slower

CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)

Higher Hashrates are Better

Single Core
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)3.68 kH/s
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)2.3 kH/s-38%
Multi Core
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)21.39 kH/s
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)9.21 kH/s2.3× slower

Memory Performance

Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks

PassMark RAM

Higher Scores are Better

RAM Score
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)1,271
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)2574.9× slower

AI & LLM Performance

Large Language Model inference performance

Ollama LLM Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)Tokens/sec: 9.65 tok/sTokens/Watt: 0.77 tok/WTokens/Dollar: 0.04 tok/$

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

Storage Performance

Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO

fio Storage Performance - microSD

Higher Speeds are Better • Raspberry Pi 64GB (64GB microSD)

4K Random Read
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)8.6 MB/s2.1× slower
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)18.2 MB/s
4K Random Write
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)9.9 MB/s
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)9 MB/s-9%

fio Storage Performance - eMMC

Higher Speeds are Better • ArmSoM AIM7 (32GB eMMC)

ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)4K Random Read: 67.9 MB/s4K Random Write: 19.6 MB/s

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

Network Performance

Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3

iPerf3 Network Performance

Higher Speeds are Better

Ethernet Up
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)943 Mbps
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)941 Mbps
Ethernet Down
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)941 Mbps
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)921 Mbps-2%

Power & Thermal

Power consumption at idle and under various workloads

Power Consumption

Lower is "Better"

Load Power
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)7.7W+7%
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)7.2W
Ollama Max
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)14.7W
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)No Data
Linpack Max
ArmSoM AIM7 (8GB)19.5W2.1× more
NVIDIA Jetson Nano (2GB)9.1W

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the ArmSoM AIM7 or the NVIDIA Jetson Nano?

The ArmSoM AIM7 is faster in our testing, scoring 3,186 in Geekbench 6 multi-core versus 795 for the NVIDIA Jetson Nano, a 301% advantage.

Which board is the best value?

Of the boards in this comparison, the NVIDIA Jetson Nano offers the best performance per dollar: 16.2 Geekbench 6 multi-core points per dollar at $49.00.

Add One More Board

You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.