Raspberry Pi 5 vs Radxa X4
Benchmarks, specifications, and real-world performance data
Expert Summary
The Radxa X4 uses an Intel N100, so you get x86 compatibility. Windows runs natively, and you don't need to hunt down ARM-specific builds of software. It has 2.5GbE networking and a proper M.2 2230 slot for NVMe (PCIe Gen3 x4), which means storage and network speeds blow past what the Pi 5 can do.
The downside? Power draw. The X4 needs more juice and better cooling to avoid throttling. It uses an RP2040 to handle GPIO, which works, but the Pi 5 is still the safer choice if you're doing anything with HATs or low-level hardware projects as you can't access the GPIO directly, it has to go through the USB connection. The X4 makes sense if you need x86 compatibility or want a high-speed network node. The Pi 5 makes sense if you want something that sips power and has the full community behind it.
Read our individual reviews:
Legend
Detailed Reviews
Read our comprehensive reviews from bret.dk featuring data and benchmarks from sbc.compare:
Geekbench 6
Higher Scores are Better
7-Zip Benchmark
Higher Scores are Better
High Performance Linpack
Higher Scores are Better
UnixBench
Higher Scores are Better
PassMark PerformanceTest
Higher Scores are Better
CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)
Higher Hashrates are Better
Power Consumption
Lower is "Better"
iPerf3 Network Performance
Higher Speeds are Better
fio Storage Performance - microSD
Higher Speeds are Better • Raspberry Pi 64GB (64GB microSD)
fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe
Higher Speeds are Better • Crucial P5 Plus (1024GB M.2 NVMe), Western Digital Black SN770M (500GB M.2 NVMe)
Ollama LLM Benchmark
Higher Scores are Better
Add One More Board
You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.