Raspberry Pi 5 vs Radxa X4
Benchmarks, specifications, and real-world performance data
Expert Summary
The Radxa X4 uses an Intel N100, so you get x86 compatibility. Windows runs natively, and you don't need to hunt down ARM-specific builds of software. It has 2.5GbE networking and a proper M.2 2230 slot for NVMe (PCIe Gen3 x4), which means storage and network speeds blow past what the Pi 5 can do.
The downside? Power draw. The X4 needs more juice and better cooling to avoid throttling. It uses an RP2040 to handle GPIO, which works, but the Pi 5 is still the safer choice if you're doing anything with HATs or low-level hardware projects as you can't access the GPIO directly, it has to go through the USB connection. The X4 makes sense if you need x86 compatibility or want a high-speed network node. The Pi 5 makes sense if you want something that sips power and has the full community behind it.
Read our individual reviews:
Legend
Detailed Reviews
Read our comprehensive reviews from bret.dk featuring data and benchmarks from sbc.compare:
CPU Performance
Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads
Geekbench 6
Higher Scores are Better
7-Zip Benchmark
Higher Scores are Better
High Performance Linpack
Higher Scores are Better
UnixBench
Higher Scores are Better
PassMark CPU
Higher Scores are Better
CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)
Higher Hashrates are Better
Memory Performance
Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks
PassMark RAM
Higher Scores are Better
GPU Performance
Graphics rendering performance using OpenGL and Vulkan
glmark2 (OpenGL)
Higher Scores are Better
vkmark (Vulkan)
Higher Scores are Better
AI & LLM Performance
Large Language Model inference performance
Ollama LLM Benchmark
Higher Scores are Better
Storage Performance
Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO
fio Storage Performance - microSD
Higher Speeds are Better • Raspberry Pi 64GB (64GB microSD)
fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe
Higher Speeds are Better • Crucial P5 Plus (1024GB M.2 NVMe), Western Digital Black SN770M (500GB M.2 NVMe)
Network Performance
Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3
iPerf3 Network Performance
Higher Speeds are Better
Power & Thermal
Power consumption at idle and under various workloads
Power Consumption
Lower is "Better"
Related Single Board Computers
Add One More Board
You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.