Radxa logoArmSoM logo

Radxa ROCK 4D vs ArmSoM CM5 vs Dshan Pi A1

Benchmarks, specifications, and real-world performance data

Radxa ROCK 4DvsArmSoM CM5vsDshan Pi A1

Fastest

Dshan Pi A1

1,446 GB6 multi-core

Best value

Radxa ROCK 4D

22.2 GB6 pts/$ at $60

Most efficient

Radxa ROCK 4D

4.8W under load

Comparison Summary

Here we line up the Radxa ROCK 4D, the ArmSoM CM5 and the Dshan Pi A1, comparing specifications against benchmark numbers we measured ourselves on every board. Processor-wise, there is a clear winner. The Dshan Pi A1 scores 1,446 in Geekbench 6 multi-core, 6% more than the ArmSoM CM5 manages at 1,366. On performance per dollar the Radxa ROCK 4D comes out ahead, delivering 22.2 multi-core points per dollar at its $60.00 list price. If power budget matters, the Radxa ROCK 4D draws the least at 4.8W under load (1.5W at idle).

Specification
ArmSoM
CM5 (8GB)
Dshan Pi
A1 (4GB)
Basic Specifications
Price$69*
RAM8GB8GB4GB
SoC
Mali-G52 MC3
Mali-G52 MC3
Mali-G52 MC3
ArchitectureARMARMARM
CPU Cores
8 cores
4× Cortex-A72 @ 2.2GHz
4× Cortex-A53 @ 1.8GHz
8 cores
4× Cortex-A72 @ 2.2GHz
4× Cortex-A53 @ 1.8GHz
8 cores
4× Cortex-A72 @ 2.2GHz
4× Cortex-A53 @ 1.8GHz
Best in category* Manufacturer's RRP** Affiliate link; qualifying purchases may earn us a commission
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)

CPU Performance

Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads

Geekbench 6

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)319-5%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)326-3%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)336
Multi-Core
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)1,332-8%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)1,366-6%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)1,446

7-Zip Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core Combined
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)1,660 MIPS-8%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)1,714 MIPS-5%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)1,813 MIPS
Multi-Core Combined
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)10,920 MIPS-8%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)10,958 MIPS-8%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)11,926 MIPS

High Performance Linpack

Higher Scores are Better

Performance
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)22.87 GFLOPS-1%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)23.2 GFLOPS
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)21.53 GFLOPS-7%
Performance/Watt
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)3.27 GFLOPS/W
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)No Data
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)2.79 GFLOPS/W-15%

UnixBench

Higher Scores are Better

Single Core
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)502-25%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)669
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)518-23%
Multi Core
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)3,108-22%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)3,972
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)3,337-16%

PassMark CPU

Higher Scores are Better

CPU Score
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)2,149-3%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)2,201-1%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)2,224

CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)

Higher Hashrates are Better

Single Core
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)2.72 kH/s-1%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)2.73 kH/s-1%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)2.76 kH/s
Multi Core
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)18.14 kH/s-2%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)18.16 kH/s-2%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)18.52 kH/s

Memory Performance

Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks

PassMark RAM

Higher Scores are Better

RAM Score
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)887-7%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)916-4%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)957

TinyMemBench

Higher Bandwidth is Better

Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)memcpy: 5,730.4 MB/smemset: 16,916.2 MB/s

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

AI & LLM Performance

Large Language Model inference performance

Ollama LLM Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Tokens/sec
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)7.69 tok/s-14%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)No Data
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)8.94 tok/s
Tokens/Watt
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)1.3 tok/W
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)No Data
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)1.19 tok/W-8%
Tokens/Dollar
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)0.13 tok/$
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)No Data
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)0.13 tok/$

Storage Performance

Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO

fio Storage Performance - microSD

Higher Speeds are Better • Raspberry Pi 64GB (64GB microSD)

4K Random Read
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)6.6 MB/s-25%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)8.7 MB/s-1%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)8.8 MB/s
4K Random Write
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)7.8 MB/s-10%
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)8.7 MB/s
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)8.5 MB/s-2%

fio Storage Performance - eMMC

Higher Speeds are Better • ArmSoM CM5 (64GB eMMC), Dshan Pi A1 (32GB eMMC)

4K Random Read
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)No Data
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)46.8 MB/s-31%
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)67.7 MB/s
4K Random Write
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)No Data
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)78.9 MB/s
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)19.6 MB/s4.0× slower

fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe

Higher Speeds are Better • Crucial P5 Plus (1024GB M.2 NVMe)

ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)4K Random Read: 391.5 MB/s4K Random Write: 370.5 MB/s

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

fio Storage Performance - UFS

Higher Speeds are Better • Radxa UFS (128GB UFS)

Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)4K Random Read: 290.7 MB/s4K Random Write: 250.1 MB/s

Only this board has been tested so far, so there is nothing to compare against yet.

Network Performance

Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3

iPerf3 Network Performance

Higher Speeds are Better

Ethernet Up
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)936 Mbps
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)938 Mbps
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)940 Mbps
Ethernet Down
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)941 Mbps
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)941 Mbps
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)937 Mbps

Power & Thermal

Power consumption at idle and under various workloads

Power Consumption

Lower is "Better"

Idle Power
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)1.5W
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)No Data
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)1.9W+27%
Load Power
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)4.8W
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)No Data
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)5.4W+13%
Ollama Max
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)6.2W
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)No Data
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)7.5W+21%
Linpack Max
Radxa ROCK 4D (8GB)7W
ArmSoM CM5 (8GB)No Data
Dshan Pi A1 (4GB)7.7W+10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is faster, the Dshan Pi A1 or the ArmSoM CM5?

The Dshan Pi A1 is faster in our testing, scoring 1,446 in Geekbench 6 multi-core versus 1,366 for the ArmSoM CM5, a 6% advantage.

Which board is the best value?

Of the boards in this comparison, the Radxa ROCK 4D offers the best performance per dollar: 22.2 Geekbench 6 multi-core points per dollar at $60.00.