Radxa X4 vs Forlinx FET3576-C

Benchmarks, specifications, and real-world performance data

Specification
Basic Specifications
Price$210*
RAM8GB2GB
SoC
Intel® UHD Graphics
Mali-G52 MC3
Architecturex86ARM
CPU Cores
4 cores
4× Alder Lake-N @ 3.2GHz
8 cores
4× Cortex-A72 @ 2.2GHz
4× Cortex-A53 @ 1.8GHz

Legend

Best value in category
Key performance metric
*Manufacturer's RRP
**Affiliate link that may result in commissions if you purchase a qualifying item
📖

Detailed Reviews

Read our comprehensive reviews from bret.dk featuring data and benchmarks from sbc.compare:

bret.dk logo
Radxa X4 (8GB)
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)

CPU Performance

Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads

Geekbench 6

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,243
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
No Data
Multi-Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
2,981
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
No Data

7-Zip Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core Combined
Radxa X4 (8GB)
3,756 MIPS
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
No Data
Multi-Core Combined
Radxa X4 (8GB)
9,597 MIPS
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
No Data

High Performance Linpack

Higher Scores are Better

Performance
Radxa X4 (8GB)
27.19 GFLOPS
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
15.23 GFLOPS
Performance/Watt
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1.23 GFLOPS/W
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
2.05 GFLOPS/W

UnixBench

Higher Scores are Better

Single Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,625
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
718
Multi Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
3,952
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
4,286

PassMark CPU

Higher Scores are Better

CPU Score
Radxa X4 (8GB)
4,782
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
2,228

CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)

Higher Hashrates are Better

Single Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
5.61 kH/s
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
2.78 kH/s
Multi Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
22.13 kH/s
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
18.66 kH/s

Memory Performance

Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks

PassMark RAM

Higher Scores are Better

RAM Score
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,815
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
747

AI & LLM Performance

Large Language Model inference performance

Ollama LLM Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Tokens/sec
Radxa X4 (8GB)
13.77 tok/s
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
8.62 tok/s
Tokens/Watt
Radxa X4 (8GB)
0.69 tok/W
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
0.96 tok/W
Tokens/Dollar
Radxa X4 (8GB)
0.17 tok/$
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
0.04 tok/$

Storage Performance

Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO

fio Storage Performance - microSD

Higher Speeds are Better • Raspberry Pi 64GB (64GB microSD)

4K Random Read
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
7.9 MB/s
4K Random Write
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
8.3 MB/s

fio Storage Performance - eMMC

Higher Speeds are Better • Forlinx OK-3576-C (32GB eMMC)

4K Random Read
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
43.9 MB/s
4K Random Write
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
32.4 MB/s

fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe

Higher Speeds are Better • Western Digital Black SN770M (500GB M.2 NVMe)

4K Random Read
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,069.6 MB/s
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
No Data
4K Random Write
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,013.3 MB/s
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
No Data

Network Performance

Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3

iPerf3 Network Performance

Higher Speeds are Better

Ethernet Up
Radxa X4 (8GB)
2,350 Mbps
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
939 Mbps
Ethernet Down
Radxa X4 (8GB)
2,355 Mbps
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
941 Mbps

Power & Thermal

Power consumption at idle and under various workloads

Power Consumption

Lower is "Better"

Idle Power
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
3.5W
Load Power
Radxa X4 (8GB)
12.2W
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
6.8W
Ollama Max
Radxa X4 (8GB)
20.5W
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
9W
Linpack Max
Radxa X4 (8GB)
22.1W
Forlinx FET3576-C (2GB)
7.4W

Add One More Board

You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.