Radxa X4 vs Radxa Orion O6N

Benchmarks, specifications, and real-world performance data

Specification
Basic Specifications
Price$199*
RAM8GB32GB
SoC
Intel® UHD Graphics
Immortalis-G720 MC10
Architecturex86ARM
CPU Cores
4 cores
4× Alder Lake-N @ 3.2GHz
12 cores
4× Cortex-A720 @ 2.6GHz
4× Cortex-A720 @ 2.4GHz
4× Cortex-A520 @ 1.8GHz

Legend

Best value in category
Key performance metric
*Manufacturer's RRP
**Affiliate link that may result in commissions if you purchase a qualifying item
📖

Detailed Reviews

Read our comprehensive reviews from bret.dk featuring data and benchmarks from sbc.compare:

bret.dk logo
Radxa X4 (8GB)
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)

CPU Performance

Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads

Geekbench 6

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,243
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
1,327
Multi-Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
2,981
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
6,954

7-Zip Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core Combined
Radxa X4 (8GB)
3,756 MIPS
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
3,867 MIPS
Multi-Core Combined
Radxa X4 (8GB)
9,597 MIPS
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
33,823 MIPS

High Performance Linpack

Higher Scores are Better

Performance
Radxa X4 (8GB)
27.19 GFLOPS
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
137.16 GFLOPS
Performance/Watt
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1.23 GFLOPS/W
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
3.52 GFLOPS/W

UnixBench

Higher Scores are Better

Single Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,625
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
1,386
Multi Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
3,952
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
9,742

PassMark CPU

Higher Scores are Better

CPU Score
Radxa X4 (8GB)
4,782
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
7,269

CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)

Higher Hashrates are Better

Single Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
5.61 kH/s
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
4.84 kH/s
Multi Core
Radxa X4 (8GB)
22.13 kH/s
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
42.99 kH/s

Memory Performance

Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks

TinyMemBench

Higher Bandwidth is Better

memcpy
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
16,366.2 MB/s
memset
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
41,322.3 MB/s

PassMark RAM

Higher Scores are Better

RAM Score
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,815
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
1,953

GPU Performance

Graphics rendering performance using OpenGL and Vulkan

glmark2 (OpenGL)

Higher Scores are Better

1080p
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
1,717
4K
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
632

vkmark (Vulkan)

Higher Scores are Better

1080p
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
902
4K
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
309

AI & LLM Performance

Large Language Model inference performance

Ollama LLM Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Tokens/sec
Radxa X4 (8GB)
13.77 tok/s
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
19.04 tok/s
Tokens/Watt
Radxa X4 (8GB)
0.69 tok/W
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
0.68 tok/W
Tokens/Dollar
Radxa X4 (8GB)
0.17 tok/$
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
0.1 tok/$

Storage Performance

Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO

fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe

Higher Speeds are Better • Western Digital Black SN770M (500GB M.2 NVMe), Crucial P5 Plus (1024GB M.2 NVMe)

4K Random Read
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,069.6 MB/s
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
863.6 MB/s
4K Random Write
Radxa X4 (8GB)
1,013.3 MB/s
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
640.7 MB/s

fio Storage Performance - UFS

Higher Speeds are Better • Radxa UFS (128GB UFS)

4K Random Read
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
16.3 MB/s
4K Random Write
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
20.4 MB/s

Network Performance

Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3

iPerf3 Network Performance

Higher Speeds are Better

Ethernet Up
Radxa X4 (8GB)
2,350 Mbps
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
942 Mbps
Ethernet Down
Radxa X4 (8GB)
2,355 Mbps
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
941 Mbps

Power & Thermal

Power consumption at idle and under various workloads

Power Consumption

Lower is "Better"

Idle Power
Radxa X4 (8GB)
No Data
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
9.3W
Load Power
Radxa X4 (8GB)
12.2W
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
23.7W
Ollama Max
Radxa X4 (8GB)
20.5W
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
33.9W
Linpack Max
Radxa X4 (8GB)
22.1W
Radxa Orion O6N (32GB)
39W

Add One More Board

You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.