Raspberry Pi 5 vs Radxa ROCK 4B+

Benchmarks, specifications, and real-world performance data

Specification
Basic Specifications
Price$68*
RAM2GB4GB
SoC
VideoCore VII
Mali-T860 MP4
ArchitectureARMARM
CPU Cores
4 cores
4× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz
6 cores

Legend

Best value in category
Key performance metric
*Manufacturer's RRP
**Affiliate link that may result in commissions if you purchase a qualifying item
📖

Detailed Reviews

Read our comprehensive reviews from bret.dk featuring data and benchmarks from sbc.compare:

bret.dk logo
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)

CPU Performance

Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads

Geekbench 6

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
890
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
315
Multi-Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
1,901
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
782

7-Zip Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core Combined
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
3,334 MIPS
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
1,832 MIPS
Multi-Core Combined
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
11,521 MIPS
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
6,509 MIPS

High Performance Linpack

Higher Scores are Better

Performance
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
28.18 GFLOPS
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
14.55 GFLOPS
Performance/Watt
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
2.78 GFLOPS/W
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
0.92 GFLOPS/W

UnixBench

Higher Scores are Better

Single Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
1,642
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
641
Multi Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
4,309
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
2,101

PassMark CPU

Higher Scores are Better

CPU Score
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
2,297
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
1,212

CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)

Higher Hashrates are Better

Single Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
3.86 kH/s
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
2.5 kH/s
Multi Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
15.42 kH/s
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
10.7 kH/s

Memory Performance

Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks

TinyMemBench

Higher Bandwidth is Better

memcpy
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
2,434 MB/s
memset
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
5,599.4 MB/s

PassMark RAM

Higher Scores are Better

RAM Score
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
1,169
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
733

AI & LLM Performance

Large Language Model inference performance

Ollama LLM Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Tokens/sec
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
9.94 tok/s
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
4.4 tok/s
Tokens/Watt
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
1.07 tok/W
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
0.35 tok/W
Tokens/Dollar
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
0.18 tok/$
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
0.06 tok/$

Storage Performance

Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO

fio Storage Performance - microSD

Higher Speeds are Better • Raspberry Pi 64GB (64GB microSD)

4K Random Read
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
22 MB/s
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
11.4 MB/s
4K Random Write
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
14.9 MB/s
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
7 MB/s

fio Storage Performance - eMMC

Higher Speeds are Better • Radxa ROCK 4B+ (32GB eMMC)

4K Random Read
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
46.9 MB/s
4K Random Write
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
46.5 MB/s

fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe

Higher Speeds are Better • Crucial P5 Plus (1024GB M.2 NVMe)

4K Random Read
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
866.1 MB/s
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
269.8 MB/s
4K Random Write
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
590.9 MB/s
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
186.8 MB/s

Network Performance

Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3

iPerf3 Network Performance

Higher Speeds are Better

Ethernet Up
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
937 Mbps
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
No Data
Ethernet Down
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
941 Mbps
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
No Data
WiFi Up
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
254 Mbps
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
No Data
WiFi Down
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
204 Mbps
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
No Data

Power & Thermal

Power consumption at idle and under various workloads

Power Consumption

Lower is "Better"

Idle Power
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
4.3W
Load Power
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
6.1W
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
10.5W
Ollama Max
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
9.3W
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
12.2W
Linpack Max
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
10.1W
Radxa ROCK 4B+ (4GB)
15.7W

Add One More Board

You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.