Raspberry Pi 5 vs Radxa CM5 Lite

Benchmarks, specifications, and real-world performance data

Specification
Basic Specifications
Price$119*
RAM2GB8GB
SoC
VideoCore VII
ArchitectureARMARM
CPU Cores
4 cores
4× Cortex-A76 @ 2.4GHz
6 cores

Legend

Best value in category
Key performance metric
*Manufacturer's RRP
**Affiliate link that may result in commissions if you purchase a qualifying item
📖

Detailed Reviews

Read our comprehensive reviews from bret.dk featuring data and benchmarks from sbc.compare:

bret.dk logo
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)

CPU Performance

Processor performance across single and multi-core workloads

Geekbench 6

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
890
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
875
Multi-Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
1,901
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
2,269

7-Zip Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Single-Core Combined
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
3,334 MIPS
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
3,187 MIPS
Multi-Core Combined
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
11,521 MIPS
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
11,639 MIPS

High Performance Linpack

Higher Scores are Better

Performance
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
28.18 GFLOPS
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
25.34 GFLOPS
Performance/Watt
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
2.78 GFLOPS/W
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
2.19 GFLOPS/W

UnixBench

Higher Scores are Better

Single Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
1,642
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
1,100
Multi Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
4,309
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
3,646

PassMark CPU

Higher Scores are Better

CPU Score
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
2,297
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
2,091

CPU Mining (cpuminer-multi)

Higher Hashrates are Better

Single Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
3.86 kH/s
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
3.84 kH/s
Multi Core
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
15.42 kH/s
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
14.65 kH/s

Memory Performance

Memory bandwidth and throughput benchmarks

TinyMemBench

Higher Bandwidth is Better

memcpy
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
11,944.4 MB/s
memset
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
28,254.3 MB/s

PassMark RAM

Higher Scores are Better

RAM Score
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
1,169
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
1,405

AI & LLM Performance

Large Language Model inference performance

Ollama LLM Benchmark

Higher Scores are Better

Tokens/sec
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
9.94 tok/s
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
10.08 tok/s
Tokens/Watt
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
1.07 tok/W
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
1.09 tok/W
Tokens/Dollar
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
0.18 tok/$
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
0.08 tok/$

Storage Performance

Disk I/O throughput measured with FIO

fio Storage Performance - microSD

Higher Speeds are Better • Raspberry Pi 64GB (64GB microSD)

4K Random Read
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
22 MB/s
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
8.4 MB/s
4K Random Write
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
14.9 MB/s
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
10.3 MB/s

fio Storage Performance - eMMC

Higher Speeds are Better • Radxa CM5 Lite (64GB eMMC)

4K Random Read
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
100.7 MB/s
4K Random Write
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
18.4 MB/s

fio Storage Performance - M.2 NVMe

Higher Speeds are Better • Crucial P5 Plus (1024GB M.2 NVMe)

4K Random Read
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
866.1 MB/s
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
No Data
4K Random Write
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
590.9 MB/s
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
No Data

Network Performance

Ethernet and WiFi throughput measured with iPerf3

iPerf3 Network Performance

Higher Speeds are Better

Ethernet Up
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
937 Mbps
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
942 Mbps
Ethernet Down
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
941 Mbps
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
941 Mbps
WiFi Up
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
254 Mbps
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
No Data
WiFi Down
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
204 Mbps
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
No Data

Power & Thermal

Power consumption at idle and under various workloads

Power Consumption

Lower is "Better"

Idle Power
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
No Data
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
2.4W
Load Power
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
6.1W
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
6.7W
Ollama Max
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
9.3W
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
9.3W
Linpack Max
Raspberry Pi 5 (2GB)
10.1W
Radxa CM5 Lite (8GB)
11.4W

Add One More Board

You can compare up to 3 boards at once. Add one more to get the complete comparison.